Ranah Keterampilan/Psikomotor Dalam Teknik Instrumen Assesmen
Keywords:
technique, instrument, skill, psychomotorAbstract
Each learning activity has goals to be achieved. To measure the achievement of learning outcomes that have been implemented, need to be evaluated or assessment. During this time, there are still many educators who assess the ability of learners in terms of cognitive and affective course, but more than that, psychomotor ability has a position that is not less important as one indicator of the development of learners. The psychomotor domain itself is a domain related to skill or ability to act after a person receives a particular learning experience. Like cognitive, this sphere also consists of several levels or levels. In its development, the psychomotor domain is categorized into two groups, namely abstract and concrete skills. Abstract skill consists of five learning abilities that include observing, asking, trying, reasoning and communicating. While the concrete skills according to Simpson's analysis consists of seven levels that include perception, readiness, imitating, accustomed to movement, adept, being a natural movement, and being an original action. Psychomotor assessment instruments consist of questions or instructions and scoring guidelines to assess the performance of learners in carrying out the command / problem. Adapaun psychomotor assessment techniques can be done using performance tests, projects, products, portfolios, and written tests. While the instrument can be a check list, rating scale, and anecdotal notes.
References
Basuki, Ismet dan Haryanto, Asesmen Pembelajaran, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2014.
Chatib, Munif, Sekolahnya Manusia; Sekolah Berbasis Multiple Intelligences, Bandung: PT Mizan Pustaka, 2014.
Daryanto, Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Rineka, 2012.
Jihad, Asep dan Abdul Haris, Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Multipressindo, 2009.
Kasilingam, Gowrishankar, dkk., “Assessment of Learning Domains to Improve Student’s Learning in Higher Education”, Journal of Young Pharmacists, Vol. VI, No. 4, Januari-Maret: 2014.
Salinan Lampiran Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RepublikIndonesia Nomor 104 tahun 2014, tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajaroleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah.
Mardapi, Djemari, Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes, Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press, 2008.
Mulyadi, Evaluasi Pendidikan: Pengembangan Model Evaluasi Pendidikan Agama di Sekolah, Malang: UIN Maliki Press, 2010.
Putra, Sitiatava Rizema, Desain Evaluasi Belajar Berbasis Kinerja, Yogyakarta: Diva Press, 2013.
Simpson, Elizabeth J., “The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain”, ERIC, Urbana: University of Lilinois, Juli: 1966. Sudijono, Anas, Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2013.
Sudjana, Nana, Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2013.
Sukardi, Evaluasi Pendidikan Prinsip dan Operasionalnya, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2008.
Sukiman, Bahan Ajar Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi, Yogyakarta: FTK UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2008.
_______, Pengembangan Sistem Evaluasi, Yogyakarta: Insan Madani, 2012.
Supratiknya, A., Penilaian Hasil Belajar dengan Teknik Nontes, Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma, 2012.
Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf, Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
Yusuf, Muri, Asesmen dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: Prenamedia Group, 2015.