PENILIAN KINERJA GURU DI SEKOLAH DASAR, ANTARA TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG

Alvi Syafaatu Rosidah; Wahyu Izza Rahman; Maharani Aulia; Ariansyah Ariansyah; Imron Fauzi

doi:10.58577/dimar.v4i1.93

Alvi Syafaatu Rosidah IAIN jember
Wahyu Izza Rahman UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq, Jember, Indonesia
Maharani Aulia UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq, Jember, Indonesia
Ariansyah Ariansyah UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq, Jember, Indonesia
Imron Fauzi UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq, Jember, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.58577/dimar.v4i1.93

Keywords: Konsep Dasar Penilaian Kinerja Guru, Problematika, Tantangan dan Peluang

Abstract

Based on Law Number 57 of 2021 concerning Teacher Performance Standards, National Education aims to educate the nation by improving the quality of teachers, therefore there is a need for teacher performance assessments that aim to determine the ability or expertise of each teacher so that teachers can carry out their duties professionally. Teacher performance is an achievement that can be measured through predetermined and mutually agreed standards. Teacher Performance Standards are related to the quality of teachers in carrying out their duties such as being a teacher who makes students feel at home in class, understanding preparation and design of learning assessments, being able to apply interesting and not boring learning media, being able to create a lively classroom atmosphere by involving students in various activities. learning experience and being a strict teacher when learning is not appropriate. This article aims to explain the importance of teacher performance and motivation to achieve teacher performance appraisal. Teaching is a noble job, because the teaching profession is very well known among the public for its patience in dealing with students. There are several obstacles or obstacles in assessing teacher performance, one of which is an unclear standard due to inconsistent and changing standards so that it can affect teacher achievement. In addition to obstacles, there are opportunities for teacher performance, namely the achievement of teacher quality so that it can be said to be a professional teacher. Teacher Performance Assessment can improve the ability of teachers in Indonesia.

References

Ali, S., & Hasanah, E. (2021). Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah dalam Menjamin Mutu Pendidikan Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di SMA Muhammadiyah 3 Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(1).

Anugraheni, Indri. (2017). Analisa Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Proses Belajar Guru. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan. Volume 4, No. 2

Fauzi, Imron. (2019), Etika Profesi Keguruan. IAIN Jember Press.

Fila, Putri. (2017). Tujuan dan Fungsi Penilaian Kinerja Guru, Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan.

Gustiawati, Resti. (2015). Pengaruh Sistem Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Unsika. Volume 3, No. 2

Imam, Andika & Slameto, (2016). Evaluasi Kinerja Guru, Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan. Volume 3, No. 2

Ismail, Laude. (2017). Konsep Penilaian Kinerja Guru dan Faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan. Volume 1, No. 1

Kartowagiran, B. 2011. Kinerja Guru Profesional (Guru Pasca Sertifikasi). Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3(3).

Marlina, E., Anisa, A., & Nafilah Fauziah, R. (2021). Optimalisasi Pendidikan Karakter melalui Workshop Peningkatan Kualitas Tenaga Pendidik dan Kependidikan di Yayasan Miftahul Falah Ashidiqiyyah Panumbangan. PROCEEDINGS UIN SUNAN GUNUNG DJATI BANDUNG, 1(21), 1–15.

Mastur, Amka & Muhammad, (2016). Problematika Penilaian Kinerja Guru. Banjarmasin. Universitas Lampung Makurat.

Mulyasari, Wiwit. (2022). Pentingnya Pembentukan Karakter Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Volume 4, No. 4

Mulyasa, E. (2005) Menjadi Guru Profesional Menciptakan Pmebelajaran Kreatif dan Menyenangkan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muslich, Masnur. (2007) Sertifikasi Guru Menuju Profesionalisme Pendidik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Riyani. (2019). Kualitas Guru Menurut UNESCO, Jakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam

Rozi, M. A. F. (2015). Profesionalisme Guru: Antara Beban dan Tanggung jawab. EDUKASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam (e-Journal), 3(2), 262-272.

Sadyadi, Hesti. (2014). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Guru di Sekolah. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, Volume, 18 No. 2

Saleh, Meylan, (2020). Merdeka Belajar di Tengah Covid 19. Gorontalo, Indonesia: Jurusan Pendidikan Guru di Sekolah Dasar FIP UNG.

Sosiawan, Arif, (2008). Tantangan dan Hambatan dalam Implementasi E-Government Indonesia. Jurnal Internasional Scopus. Vol,1 No.2

Suhartanto, A., Kusrini, K., & Henderi, H. (2016). Decision Support System Untuk Penilaian Kinerja Guru Dengan Metode Profile Matching. Jurnal Komputer Terapan, 2(2), 149–158.

Supriyono, A. (2017). PENGARUH KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK, PROFESIONAL, DAN MOTIVASI KERJA TERHADAP KINERJA GURU SEKOLAH DASAR. Jurnal Pendidikan, 18(2), 1–12.

Susliansyah, S., Rahadjeng, I., Sumarno, H., & Deleaniara. M, C. (2019). PENERAPAN METODE TOPSIS DALAM PENILAIAN KINERJA GURU TETAP SD NEGERI KEBALEN 07. Jurnal Pilar Nusa Mandiri, 15(1), 7-14.

Undang-Undang Nomor 57 Tahun 2021 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Viandari, Eka. (2022). Persyaratan Prinsip dan Aspek Penilaian Kinerja Guru (PKG), Jakarta: CV. Trans Info Media

Wilda, Y. A., & Sunoko, A. (2020). Implementasi Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Kualitas Pendidikan SMK NU Banat Kudus. Jurnal Ibriez: Jurnal Kependidikan Dasar Islam Berbasis Sains, 5(2), 169-182.

Wulandari, R., Dewi, N. A. N., Lamopia, I. W. G., & Antari, N. N. W. (2020). Representasi Peran Guru Dalam Pembentukan Pendidikan Karakter Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar di SDN 3 Tonja Denpasar. Madaniya, 1(1), 9-19.

Yusuf, A. R., & Mukhadis, A. (2018). MODEL PENGEMBANGAN PROFESIONALITAS GURU SESUAI TUNTUTAN REVITALISASI PENDIDIKAN VOKASI DI INDONESIA. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 9(2), 130-139.